<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reply to a new ham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rac.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=1332</link>
	<description>All about ham radio in Canada - Tous pour la radioamateur au Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Martin - AB9RF</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=1332&#038;cpage=1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Martin - AB9RF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=1332#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Pardon me for butting in, Peter, but I think you might want to rethink your response here.  Matthew&#039;s problem with RAC seems to be that he doesn&#039;t see what benefit he gets out of joining.  Your response doesn&#039;t seem to set out any benefits for him, or others similarly situated to him, to join RAC.

It&#039;s not enough to just exhort people to join RAC.  You have to give them solid reasons why joining RAC will aid them in the pursuit of whatever interest it is that draws them within the admittedly complex sphere of amateur radio.

This is a problem I face every year when I decide whether or not to renew my ARRL membership.  I imagine RAC members face the same difficult decision.  You need to make the case to members, and to prospective members, why RAC membership is in their interest.  And the post above, as I see it, utterly fails in that respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me for butting in, Peter, but I think you might want to rethink your response here.  Matthew&#8217;s problem with RAC seems to be that he doesn&#8217;t see what benefit he gets out of joining.  Your response doesn&#8217;t seem to set out any benefits for him, or others similarly situated to him, to join RAC.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not enough to just exhort people to join RAC.  You have to give them solid reasons why joining RAC will aid them in the pursuit of whatever interest it is that draws them within the admittedly complex sphere of amateur radio.</p>
<p>This is a problem I face every year when I decide whether or not to renew my ARRL membership.  I imagine RAC members face the same difficult decision.  You need to make the case to members, and to prospective members, why RAC membership is in their interest.  And the post above, as I see it, utterly fails in that respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik van Riel AB1KW</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=1332&#038;cpage=1#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik van Riel AB1KW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=1332#comment-356</guid>
		<description>While a nice story, I do not see anything in the article about what RAC has to entice curious young people into the hobby of amateur radio. Is that a confirmation of Matthew&#039;s complaint that RAC doesn&#039;t have anything for that target audience, and if so, are there plans to create material or activities to draw curious technically minded college age people into amateur radio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While a nice story, I do not see anything in the article about what RAC has to entice curious young people into the hobby of amateur radio. Is that a confirmation of Matthew&#8217;s complaint that RAC doesn&#8217;t have anything for that target audience, and if so, are there plans to create material or activities to draw curious technically minded college age people into amateur radio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
