<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAC Presidents writes Ontario Minister Bradley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rac.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=170</link>
	<description>All about ham radio in Canada - Tous pour la radioamateur au Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=170&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/rac-presidents-writes-ontario-minister-bradley/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>One main concern I have is that an HT radio would apparently still be banned even if we manage to get the exemption for ham equipment. I have been saying for some time that this kind of logic could pose a greater danger.

During CANWARN nets, we are often in close proximity to dangerous lightning. I have had corona discharge build up so strong prior to local strikes that I could barely hear the repeater. In these cases, using a headset or hand mic are extremely dangerous. An HT is the only safe option.

From the NOAA website:

&quot;While inside a safe vehicle, do not use electronic devices such as radio communications during a thunderstorm. Lightning striking the vehicle, especially the antenna(s), could cause serious injury if you are talking on the radio or holding the microphone at the time of the flash. Emergency officials such as police officers, firefighters and security officers should be extremely cautious using radio equipment when lightning is in the area.&quot;


Please make sure the government uses common sense with this law so that we are not put into danger by an ill-advised rule while we are serving the public. There is no operational difference between talking on a pre-programmed HT and a hand mic, but I understand an exemption for HTs is not being considered. The Minister needs to be made aware of the risk such a paradox presents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One main concern I have is that an HT radio would apparently still be banned even if we manage to get the exemption for ham equipment. I have been saying for some time that this kind of logic could pose a greater danger.</p>
<p>During CANWARN nets, we are often in close proximity to dangerous lightning. I have had corona discharge build up so strong prior to local strikes that I could barely hear the repeater. In these cases, using a headset or hand mic are extremely dangerous. An HT is the only safe option.</p>
<p>From the NOAA website:</p>
<p>&#8220;While inside a safe vehicle, do not use electronic devices such as radio communications during a thunderstorm. Lightning striking the vehicle, especially the antenna(s), could cause serious injury if you are talking on the radio or holding the microphone at the time of the flash. Emergency officials such as police officers, firefighters and security officers should be extremely cautious using radio equipment when lightning is in the area.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please make sure the government uses common sense with this law so that we are not put into danger by an ill-advised rule while we are serving the public. There is no operational difference between talking on a pre-programmed HT and a hand mic, but I understand an exemption for HTs is not being considered. The Minister needs to be made aware of the risk such a paradox presents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
