<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: B.C. hams expected to get exemption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rac.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443</link>
	<description>All about ham radio in Canada - Tous pour la radioamateur au Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavitron</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavitron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-161</guid>
		<description>From what&#039;s currently published:
http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/freeside/--%20m%20--/motor%20vehicle%20act%20%20rsbc%201996%20%20c.%20318/05_regulations/35_308_2009.xml and http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th1st/1st_read/gov15-1.htm, I see nothing in there about 2-way mobile tranceivers, despite them being listed in the &quot;handy pdf&quot; guide that va3qv posted...

tbh, I&#039;d hoped for an exemption to the whole act, under s214.5, since changing stations on my mobile takes as little attention as tweaking my GPS while driving would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what&#8217;s currently published:<br />
<a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/freeside/--%20m%20--/motor%20vehicle%20act%20%20rsbc%201996%20%20c.%20318/05_regulations/35_308_2009.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/freeside/&#8211;%20m%20&#8211;/motor%20vehicle%20act%20%20rsbc%201996%20%20c.%20318/05_regulations/35_308_2009.xml</a> and <a href="http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th1st/1st_read/gov15-1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th1st/1st_read/gov15-1.htm</a>, I see nothing in there about 2-way mobile tranceivers, despite them being listed in the &#8220;handy pdf&#8221; guide that va3qv posted&#8230;</p>
<p>tbh, I&#8217;d hoped for an exemption to the whole act, under s214.5, since changing stations on my mobile takes as little attention as tweaking my GPS while driving would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Davies va3grp</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Davies va3grp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s Saskatchewan&#039;s webite showing hand-held mikes are allowed in there driving bill as well, as of Jan.. 1st., 2010.
 We have to continue to fight for our rights to use Hand-held mikes in our mobiles, on Ontario roadways. Don&#039;t give up fighting fellow amateurs.

http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=eed1e21c-a947-446f-9ea2-994224bfd17e

73 Wayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s Saskatchewan&#8217;s webite showing hand-held mikes are allowed in there driving bill as well, as of Jan.. 1st., 2010.<br />
 We have to continue to fight for our rights to use Hand-held mikes in our mobiles, on Ontario roadways. Don&#8217;t give up fighting fellow amateurs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=eed1e21c-a947-446f-9ea2-994224bfd17e" rel="nofollow">http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=eed1e21c-a947-446f-9ea2-994224bfd17e</a></p>
<p>73 Wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Davies va3grp</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Davies va3grp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-159</guid>
		<description>http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/index.htm.

   This is the BC website that has all the details on BC&#039;s new driving laws, starting on Jan.1st., 2010. Amateurs are fully exempted in that bill.
  Ontario should also be fully exempted in the same manner.
73   Wayne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/index.htm</a>.</p>
<p>   This is the BC website that has all the details on BC&#8217;s new driving laws, starting on Jan.1st., 2010. Amateurs are fully exempted in that bill.<br />
  Ontario should also be fully exempted in the same manner.<br />
73   Wayne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: va3qv</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>va3qv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-158</guid>
		<description>it appears they got their exemption.  Well done to BC....

http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/docs/electronic-devices-while-driving-info.pdf

I am wondering why Ontario Drivers are so much more dangerous...

73bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it appears they got their exemption.  Well done to BC&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/docs/electronic-devices-while-driving-info.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/publications/docs/electronic-devices-while-driving-info.pdf</a></p>
<p>I am wondering why Ontario Drivers are so much more dangerous&#8230;</p>
<p>73bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW7AAV</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>GW7AAV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Great news.

Seasons greetings from me and mine to you and yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news.</p>
<p>Seasons greetings from me and mine to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Verdirame</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.ca/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Verdirame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racblog.wordpress.com/?p=443#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Thanks for sharing this news, and my congrats to our brethren in BC!  At the same time, this news leaves me a little bitter.  What a shame that hams in each and every province/territory have to fight this battle, over and over again!  I know this is the very nature of our federalism, but it seems ridiculous that we will now have a different set of rules for hams in every jurisdiction across the country!  The real problem here is that every province wants to do its own thing...how much simpler would it have been if the Ontario legislators had simply looked east to Quebec when formulating our own legislation, and if BC had then looked to Ontario and Quebec without &quot;reinventing the wheel&quot;?  Now we have another province where hams are exempt.  Anyway, it just seems downright silly.    :)

On the plus side, this is ammunition we could use to argue for a permanent exemption in Ontario.

73

Joe, VE3LNU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this news, and my congrats to our brethren in BC!  At the same time, this news leaves me a little bitter.  What a shame that hams in each and every province/territory have to fight this battle, over and over again!  I know this is the very nature of our federalism, but it seems ridiculous that we will now have a different set of rules for hams in every jurisdiction across the country!  The real problem here is that every province wants to do its own thing&#8230;how much simpler would it have been if the Ontario legislators had simply looked east to Quebec when formulating our own legislation, and if BC had then looked to Ontario and Quebec without &#8220;reinventing the wheel&#8221;?  Now we have another province where hams are exempt.  Anyway, it just seems downright silly.    <img src='http://blog.rac.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the plus side, this is ammunition we could use to argue for a permanent exemption in Ontario.</p>
<p>73</p>
<p>Joe, VE3LNU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
